He killed his parents and buried them. After couple of days he surrendered in police station. But media claims that he is still happy about what he has done or he is not at all guilty about what he has done.

The neighboring people curse him for his brutal action, and he appears to be least bothered. No one had a single word to say against his parents, or the parents were such a pleasing figure in the society.

If a criminal never regrets on what he has done, either he must have some solid reasons behind the crime or he must be psychic.

Can our laws make him understand the seriousness of his crime with the punishments whatever it may be. I don’t think that he could be convinced ..or in his perspective, he had done that because of xyz reasons and no regrets on that..

Again here also, the Majority wins….Everyone talks against him, and he is punished. If majority could think in his angle or understand his vision, maybe it wouldn’t have even claimed to be a crime..

Or is it like, “a crime is a crime whatever may be the circumstances?”

Which is the easiest path..? Are there any short cuts..?. 

She was asking herself.

If I am aware of the responsible path, why do I need to think about the other paths?

If there is some guilty or irresponsibility accompanying the other path, why should I follow it? Is it only because of the easiness or comfortableness in the other path?

Her introspection continued….